Have you ever thought of creating an advisory board?
As you can guess, that would be an informal group with no legal responsibilities, but one able to be called upon to act as business, industry and scientific advisors to the company or CEO.
Why?
Usually, you would want to create an advisory board to fill in the critical areas of need not evidenced in the board of directors or within the company itself. University professors, industry gurus, lawyers familiar with patent law and former executives of competitor companies are typical recruits you might consider. Sometimes, celebrities will agree to sit on an advisory board as a gift to the CEO, providing a bit of glamour for the company at small expense.
How about the size of the group?
There is no limit to the number of individuals for such a board, but there is a practical limit to the amount of cash and / or stock to be allocated to these outside advisors. The rule of thumb for an advisory board member is to expect a half to a full day each year on site, typically in a strategic planning meeting with numerous members of the staff, as well as some reasonable number of phone calls from senior members of management during the year.
How about using the names for marketing, fundraising?
Included in the “package” is the expectation that the advisor’s name will be freely used in the company’s marketing, a bio listed on the website, and occasional calls will come as references to the advisor from potential investors and others looking for deeper insight into the secret sauce of the company or state of the industry than can be provided by many on the inside.
And now the expected cost…
[Email readers, continue here…] For this, an advisory board member for a small to medium sized company should expect to receive options equal to ¼% of the fully diluted stock of the company, vesting over two years, and subsequent grants if there has been additional stock issued to dilute the advisor, bringing the advisor back to this percentage if an advisor is renewed after subsequent two-year intervals. Alternatively, some companies pay an advisor a fee of $1,000 to $2500 per “on premises” meeting day and optionally much smaller stock grants, if any.
What if an advisor acts as a consultant with more time?
Additional commitments of time by an advisory board member should be compensated as would any consultant, at half and full day rates agreed upon in advance between the CEO and the advisor. There is no rule as to uniformity of pay, as some advisors may be willing to serve at no cost while others are industry consultants used to receiving fair payment for services rendered.
Create a formal advisor agreement listing expectations.
Advisors fill blind spots in the corporate knowledge base and guide you in areas where you feel you have a personal weakness. There is usually a formal agreement between the company and the advisor, carefully calling out the time expectation, the forms and amounts of payment, and the indemnifications from liability granted by the company to the advisor in return for confidentiality and non-disclosure of company trade secrets by the advisor.
How about “chairman” of the advisory board?
A particularly strong advisor, especially if well known, may be named chairman of the advisory board, which is often just an honorary title, since the CEO is usually tasked with the planning of the full day meeting of advisors annually, and setting the agenda to match the needs of the corporate board and senior management.
Good piece Dave. You are the first person I have seen actually put a % or $ figure out there for the cost. Thanks.
Timely. I am forming an Advisory Board now for a new media company. It would be good to have a few Tigers.
Mick
As a sponsor of the Toronto Chapter of the Global Keiretsu Forum, we have struggled with our twenty year old mantra of volunteers are not to be paid and the reality that we expect a lot of our members, busy people investing their own cash.
My personal opinion is that we expect too much.
This inconvenient fact is supported by our own best practices as exemplified by The Forum’s Mid-Atlantic Chapter deal structure; a priced round with a one time preference providing investors full capital recovery.
We rely on the post funding Board to assure the wise use of capital supplied, thereby raising the question Dave has posed; how much; to whom, and for what service(s).
Responses to the questions are tied to our possession of a fully diluted capitalization table before our cheques are released from the transaction lawyer’s escrow account.
As a peer and reader of Dave’s column, possibly even the author speaking via his Chatbot, what do you think of the Keiretsu Forum’s approach? Thumbs up? Thumbs down? Why?
What would serve the founder and funders’ interest to their mutual advantage as measured by new entrant enterprise success rate?
Mick, I am a TIGER. Tell me more about your startup at my email address which you will find under “Contact Dave” at the bottom of berkus.com.
Dave