{"id":5260,"date":"2023-05-04T10:00:36","date_gmt":"2023-05-04T17:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/?p=5260"},"modified":"2023-05-04T11:08:06","modified_gmt":"2023-05-04T18:08:06","slug":"will-tech-kill-your-job-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/?p=5260","title":{"rendered":"Are you at risk for tech killing your job?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Stop me if you\u2019ve heard this story before. <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cMy job as a (newspaper publisher telephone installer, stockbroker, travel agent, retail store manager) writer, poet, commercial artist – is safe as this economy continues to grow.\u201d\u00a0 Yup. Thought so.<\/p>\n

We are in a decade of creative destruction that will affect most everybody.\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n

And the prime motivators of this massive destruction are the same class of entrepreneurs\"\" and innovators that have done it before.\u00a0 This time they are aided by tail winds brought on by the rapid spread of access to the Internet and AI. \u00a0Generative AI applications are moving so fast that two applications (ChatGPT and Midjourney) in November, 2022 are now hundreds of applications, many focused upon your particular niche.<\/p>\n

\u00a0And now everyone has access.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Consider this bit of recent history: \u00a0In 1995, thirty-five million people used the Internet. That is six-tenths of one percent of the world\u2019s population.\u00a0 And only one percent of these who had access also had mobile phones.<\/p>\n

Consider the numbers.<\/strong><\/p>\n

[Email readers, continue here…]\u00a0<\/em> <\/span>\u00a0By 2024, at least ninety percent of the global population will have regular Internet access.\u00a0 Add that to the rise of robotics, artificial intelligence, biotech, genetics, augmented and virtual reality, and we will soon see wonders we could only imagine a decade ago.\u00a0 Meanwhile, in the U.S., an estimated five million jobs will be lost to tech innovations in the next five years, with two million new jobs created in these fields alone.<\/p>\n

And then there is robotics.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Robots will perform half of all manufacturing jobs by 2025.\u00a0 Since 1999, the U.S. manufacturing workforce is down twenty-eight percent, and the U.S. has lost 54,000 manufacturing businesses<\/u>.\u00a0 In 1980, it took twenty-five jobs to produce a million dollars in manufacturing output. Today, that can be done with fewer than seven jobs.<\/p>\n

Yes, Amazon is partially to blame.\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n

Last year, Amazon employed 1,541,000 workers. But Amazon displaced at least that number of retail jobs.\u00a0 Just check your local store fronts.<\/p>\n

Higher education needs to catch up.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"Our current graduating class of college seniors reflects much of the past needs of our economic society, just as they did in the early 1970\u2019s, when many bet that aerospace jobs would continue to be the hot job ticket.\u00a0 The mismatch between what employers want today and graduating seniors majored in is striking.\u00a0 For example, 81% of businesses hiring today want graduates with business or accounting degrees. But only 19% of seniors have majored in this.\u00a0 Worse, 3.1% of seniors majored in computer science, while 65% of businesses looking to hire need these skills.\u00a0 And yet, with the rise of AI creating code, we don’t yet know how this will affect the need for new program coders, and shift that educational need to code architects, prompters and testers.<\/p>\n

And how about the new jobs to be created for \u201cprompt-masters\u201d and others manipulating or analyzing or checking AI query results. \u00a0How will college professors or newspaper editors know that content submitted is or should be original? \u00a0And Ai is now writing computer code in many languages. \u00a0Programmers or program architects (prompt-masters again) for this next generation of low code-no code?<\/p>\n

Predictable work is highest on the chopping block.<\/strong><\/p>\n

What general kinds of jobs will be lost to automation?\u00a0 Almost eighty percent of jobs performing predictable physical work will be gone.\u00a0 People in welding, soldering, working on assembly lines, food preparation or packaging of objects will be most at risk.\u00a0 Then come the unpredictable physical workers.\u00a0 Twenty-five percent of these will be gone, including jobs in construction, forestry and raising outdoor animals.<\/p>\n

White- collar jobs most at risk to the rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning are those in middle management, commodity salespeople, journalists, report writers, and even some doctors.<\/p>\n

What jobs will be safe?<\/strong><\/p>\n

And the last jobs to be lost to automation and AI are, not surprisingly, K-12 teachers, professional athletes, politicians, judges, mental health professionals and coaches, advisors and motivators.<\/p>\n

Tech entrepreneurs are out there in every corner of the world today finding ways to eradicate disease, provide clean water, change the way we deliver education, fight obesity and climate change, and reduce accidental deaths.\u00a0 These heroes of the next generation are remaking our lives at hyper-speed.<\/p>\n

Old jobs \u2013 new jobs<\/strong><\/p>\n

So, will tech take your job, or your offspring\u2019s job or your grandkid\u2019s job?\u00a0 Old jobs will be gone for sure.\u00a0 But that same villain, tech, will prove to be a creator of jobs we can\u2019t even imagine today, and will improve the quality of our lives immeasurably at the same time.<\/p>\n

These are times to celebrate innovation and trust that, like many eras in the past, the world will be a better place in which to live and work because of their world-changing innovations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Stop me if you\u2019ve heard this story before. \u201cMy job as a (newspaper publisher telephone installer, stockbroker, travel agent, retail store manager) writer, poet, commercial artist – is safe as this economy continues to grow.\u201d\u00a0 Yup. Thought so. We are … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-depending-upon-others","category-protecting-the-business"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5260\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}