{"id":4733,"date":"2021-10-07T10:00:38","date_gmt":"2021-10-07T17:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/?p=4733"},"modified":"2021-09-24T16:44:59","modified_gmt":"2021-09-24T23:44:59","slug":"reward-success-and-failure-punish-only-inaction-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/?p=4733","title":{"rendered":"Reward success and failure. Punish only inaction."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Reward failure?\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That may be a difficult concept for an executive. And there are limits of course. We wouldn\u2019t reward a failure to follow laws, or protect lives, or deliberate endangerment of the company or its people.<\/p>\n<p><strong>There are \u201cgood\u201d failures.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>But should we reward a research team that fails for the fourth time to find the solution to a<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-3692\" src=\"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/Failures-HBS-review.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"196\" height=\"257\" \/> nagging problem &#8211; on the way to a new product? \u00a0What if those failures are commonplace?\u00a0\u00a0 Where do we draw the line?\u00a0 We know that Edison tried a thousand types of material before finding tungsten for the core of the light bulb.\u00a0 If he had been a research employee reporting to you, at what point would you have pulled the plug on the project, or become disillusioned with the person?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Relate this to the culture of your company.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The culture of the company you grow is very much influenced by your actions in rewarding or punishing employees or whole departments. And the best companies seem to be those that are motivated from the top to push limits within reason to find better ways to do things, to create products, to expand the market.\u00a0 The CEO must realize that most such efforts lead to a dead end or will fail outright.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Here\u2019s (another) personal story\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><em>[Email readers, continue here&#8230;]<\/em><\/span>\u00a0 \u00a0I was once in the record business.\u00a0 Speak about insanity. Only two percent of all records released broke even.\u00a0 Of course, the major hits paid for thousands of misses.\u00a0 In venture capital, the conventional wisdom is that one in<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2525\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2525\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2525\" src=\"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Soccer_goal_keepr-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-2525\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><em>(Sometimes you miss the goal.)<\/em><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<p>ten investments will more than pay for the complete loss of half of those ten investments.\u00a0 Yet investors reward the VC\u2019s with a track record of one in ten, and record companies still churn out a reduced number of recordings, knowing that a great majority will fail to break even.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Let\u2019s finish with a question for you?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>So, where does the learned, best of breed CEO or manager step in to administer punishment?\u00a0 As the headline infers, a visionary, proactive leader should not be able to stand by and condone inaction.\u00a0 That is not only a waste of corporate assets, but the fixed overhead eaten by the inactive period keeps draining the cash and time resources of the corporation with nothing to show for it.\u00a0 Wouldn\u2019t you rather dissect the reasons for a failure and move forward, than have nothing to show for time and money spent in wasted fixed overhead?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reward failure?\u00a0 That may be a difficult concept for an executive. And there are limits of course. We wouldn\u2019t reward a failure to follow laws, or protect lives, or deliberate endangerment of the company or its people. There are \u201cgood\u201d &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/?p=4733\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4733","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-depending-upon-others","category-surrounding-yourself-with-talent"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4733","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4733"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4733\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4733"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4733"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/berkonomics.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4733"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}