<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.lerougeliet.com/ns/rssFeedStyles#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What can we learn from the non-profit world?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://berkonomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=5173&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-can-we-learn-from-the-non-profit-world</link>
	<description>Dave Berkus&#039; business insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:04:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Harley Kaufman		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=5173&#038;cpage=1#comment-159611</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harley Kaufman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=5173#comment-159611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, again, Dave
I&#039;ve had the privilege of being in charge of two (now) very successful 501-c-3 orgs for a decade.  First lesson is that the commonly used name for them is wrong and leads to an incorrect approach to the business (and yes, 501-c-3&#039;s are businesses!).  The proper nomenclature should be &quot;not for profit (NFP)&quot; and I believe this is the way they are described in the IRS code.  This change of perspective allows leadership to understand that all the goals of a for a for profit entity should be respected in an NFP.  In the NFP world the profit is generally called the &quot;remainder&quot;; a term from the federal reporting document called the &quot;990&quot;.  View the NFP as requiring revenue (most often, donations, but may have other sources) to exist, and hopefully have a remainder at the end of the FY to add to their reserves for the rainy day that will, most assuredly, arrive.
NFPs have a mission statement and goal markedly different from a for profit entity.  It is not profit, it is the mission!  This may help volunteer leadership (most drawn from for profit entities) to adjust their thinking appropriately.

Harley]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, again, Dave<br />
I&#8217;ve had the privilege of being in charge of two (now) very successful 501-c-3 orgs for a decade.  First lesson is that the commonly used name for them is wrong and leads to an incorrect approach to the business (and yes, 501-c-3&#8217;s are businesses!).  The proper nomenclature should be &#8220;not for profit (NFP)&#8221; and I believe this is the way they are described in the IRS code.  This change of perspective allows leadership to understand that all the goals of a for a for profit entity should be respected in an NFP.  In the NFP world the profit is generally called the &#8220;remainder&#8221;; a term from the federal reporting document called the &#8220;990&#8221;.  View the NFP as requiring revenue (most often, donations, but may have other sources) to exist, and hopefully have a remainder at the end of the FY to add to their reserves for the rainy day that will, most assuredly, arrive.<br />
NFPs have a mission statement and goal markedly different from a for profit entity.  It is not profit, it is the mission!  This may help volunteer leadership (most drawn from for profit entities) to adjust their thinking appropriately.</p>
<p>Harley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
