<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.lerougeliet.com/ns/rssFeedStyles#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Should you cast your net where the big fish swim?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://berkonomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=4236&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=should-you-cast-your-net-where-the-big-fish-swim</link>
	<description>Dave Berkus&#039; business insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 22:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Harley Kaufman		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=4236&#038;cpage=1#comment-138109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harley Kaufman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 22:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=4236#comment-138109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting that you used Sears as an example of not so good corporate behavior. They
have deserved it for years.  A little research about their business practices in the 30&#039;s, 40&#039;s and 50&#039;s of the last century might uncover corporate behavior that consciously made themselves progressively more and more important to suppliers - exciting them with increasing consequential orders provoking more capital investment with borrowed money.  Then, one day, the story goes that Sears reputedly would come along and tell them that they were going to find another supplier.  Panic, despair, fright and all that.  Finally, the Sears question:  &quot;Do you think your company might be for sale to us?&quot;  Ruthlessly and devastatingly simple, don&#039;t you think.  The cautionary tale is just as simple -- don&#039;t let one customer become such that your whole company depends on their revenues!  Make sure you have a growing  base of like sized customers before you pat yourself on the back!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that you used Sears as an example of not so good corporate behavior. They<br />
have deserved it for years.  A little research about their business practices in the 30&#8217;s, 40&#8217;s and 50&#8217;s of the last century might uncover corporate behavior that consciously made themselves progressively more and more important to suppliers &#8211; exciting them with increasing consequential orders provoking more capital investment with borrowed money.  Then, one day, the story goes that Sears reputedly would come along and tell them that they were going to find another supplier.  Panic, despair, fright and all that.  Finally, the Sears question:  &#8220;Do you think your company might be for sale to us?&#8221;  Ruthlessly and devastatingly simple, don&#8217;t you think.  The cautionary tale is just as simple &#8212; don&#8217;t let one customer become such that your whole company depends on their revenues!  Make sure you have a growing  base of like sized customers before you pat yourself on the back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Curtis		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=4236&#038;cpage=1#comment-138075</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Curtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 18:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=4236#comment-138075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I always chose to go for the higher margin singles and doubles rather than chasing the low margin “home runs”. 

There are several good reasons for this strategy.
1. You don’t overbuild staff and infrastructure to handle the big deal. 
2. Big deals are notoriously difficult to close, finance and even more difficult to administer. 
3. The bigger the customer the more resources it has at its disposal to look for better pricing from a competitor, even after the deal is closed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always chose to go for the higher margin singles and doubles rather than chasing the low margin “home runs”. </p>
<p>There are several good reasons for this strategy.<br />
1. You don’t overbuild staff and infrastructure to handle the big deal.<br />
2. Big deals are notoriously difficult to close, finance and even more difficult to administer.<br />
3. The bigger the customer the more resources it has at its disposal to look for better pricing from a competitor, even after the deal is closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
