<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.lerougeliet.com/ns/rssFeedStyles#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Could you have created a “dirty cap table?”	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://berkonomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=3757&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=could-you-have-created-a-dirty-cap-table</link>
	<description>Dave Berkus&#039; business insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:02:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Lipper		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=3757&#038;cpage=1#comment-127200</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Lipper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=3757#comment-127200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Check with an attorney to confirm my belief is that selling a royalty, a percentage of the company&#039;s revenues, for an agreed number of years, is far simpler and less complicated than selling stock, which is a share of ownership, in a company. There is no requirement to notify any regulatory agency of the transaction.

The owner of the company will have to convince one or more investors that the product or service superiority to be produced will create both consumer demand of sufficient scale to assure profitability. The royalty investor is primarily interested in the growth of revenues, not profits. There is no equity dilution, only an initial lessening of profit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check with an attorney to confirm my belief is that selling a royalty, a percentage of the company&#8217;s revenues, for an agreed number of years, is far simpler and less complicated than selling stock, which is a share of ownership, in a company. There is no requirement to notify any regulatory agency of the transaction.</p>
<p>The owner of the company will have to convince one or more investors that the product or service superiority to be produced will create both consumer demand of sufficient scale to assure profitability. The royalty investor is primarily interested in the growth of revenues, not profits. There is no equity dilution, only an initial lessening of profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Morganstern		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=3757&#038;cpage=1#comment-127198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Morganstern]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=3757#comment-127198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well done DC, quite right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done DC, quite right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dc palter		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=3757&#038;cpage=1#comment-127194</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dc palter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=3757#comment-127194</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[*excluding* the value of the investor’s principal residence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*excluding* the value of the investor’s principal residence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
