<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.lerougeliet.com/ns/rssFeedStyles#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How do you pay an early stage board?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://berkonomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=3322&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-do-you-pay-an-early-stage-board</link>
	<description>Dave Berkus&#039; business insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 02:26:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Wallach		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=3322&#038;cpage=1#comment-114875</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Wallach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 02:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=3322#comment-114875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That makes sense Dave.  Seems like a balanced approach...thanks!
- Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense Dave.  Seems like a balanced approach&#8230;thanks!<br />
&#8211; Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Berkus		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=3322&#038;cpage=1#comment-114862</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Berkus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=3322#comment-114862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://berkonomics.com/?p=3322&#038;cpage=1#comment-114860&quot;&gt;Bob Wallach&lt;/a&gt;.

Bob,
I would never make a side agreement with a board member to allow any form of anti-dilution, which is what you are asking about.  Board members, like the founders, are diluted with each round...  What you can do is: upon completion of a two or three year vesting period of continued good service, consider a new grant of an option for a small amount to bring the board member back to the original percentage of the first grant, but vesting for another 2-3 years of service.  Consider this: Granting 1% for 2 years of service each two years to three outside board members would equal 3% of equity every two years - and after ten years, your outside board members would own a claim upon 15% of the company.  No outside investor or founder would accept that.  With the method above, the three outside board members would at most still have access to 3% of the fully diluted equity for their continued board service...
-Dave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://berkonomics.com/?p=3322&#038;cpage=1#comment-114860">Bob Wallach</a>.</p>
<p>Bob,<br />
I would never make a side agreement with a board member to allow any form of anti-dilution, which is what you are asking about.  Board members, like the founders, are diluted with each round&#8230;  What you can do is: upon completion of a two or three year vesting period of continued good service, consider a new grant of an option for a small amount to bring the board member back to the original percentage of the first grant, but vesting for another 2-3 years of service.  Consider this: Granting 1% for 2 years of service each two years to three outside board members would equal 3% of equity every two years &#8211; and after ten years, your outside board members would own a claim upon 15% of the company.  No outside investor or founder would accept that.  With the method above, the three outside board members would at most still have access to 3% of the fully diluted equity for their continued board service&#8230;<br />
-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Wallach		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=3322&#038;cpage=1#comment-114860</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Wallach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=3322#comment-114860</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dave, do you feel that a board member who gets involved with a startup and its early days should have their stock options increased to address the dilution effect of subsequent funding rounds?

Thanks!

Bob Wallach
Bobwallach@comcast.net]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, do you feel that a board member who gets involved with a startup and its early days should have their stock options increased to address the dilution effect of subsequent funding rounds?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Bob Wallach<br />
<a href="mailto:Bobwallach@comcast.net">Bobwallach@comcast.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
