<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.lerougeliet.com/ns/rssFeedStyles#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Outside investors want liquidity, not love.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://berkonomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=287&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=outside-investors-want-liquidity-not-love</link>
	<description>Dave Berkus&#039; business insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:25:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Berkus		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=287&#038;cpage=1#comment-89</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Berkus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=287#comment-89</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NB&#039;s question is a good one. Many seasoned angels are changing their focus from raw startups to those that have shown some form of traction - strategic relationship in place or early revenue from friends and family.  And many have moved to fund companies where the money needed is less than a full later VC round.  It is only natural to assume that some will migrate to invest principally in rounds that are later than the first angel round, although I have not yet spoken with any deliberately taking this tact.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NB&#8217;s question is a good one. Many seasoned angels are changing their focus from raw startups to those that have shown some form of traction &#8211; strategic relationship in place or early revenue from friends and family.  And many have moved to fund companies where the money needed is less than a full later VC round.  It is only natural to assume that some will migrate to invest principally in rounds that are later than the first angel round, although I have not yet spoken with any deliberately taking this tact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nathaniel Broughton		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=287&#038;cpage=1#comment-88</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Broughton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=287#comment-88</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are there angels who specifically look for the opportunity to be in the later rounds of funding?  Besides &quot;the last money has the first say&quot;, what are other benefits or pitfalls of avoiding investing early and looking for aged, yet stagnant companies?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there angels who specifically look for the opportunity to be in the later rounds of funding?  Besides &#8220;the last money has the first say&#8221;, what are other benefits or pitfalls of avoiding investing early and looking for aged, yet stagnant companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
