<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.lerougeliet.com/ns/rssFeedStyles#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to plan to make a successful acquisition	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://berkonomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2801&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-to-plan-to-make-a-successful-acquisition</link>
	<description>Dave Berkus&#039; business insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dick Gregerson		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2801&#038;cpage=1#comment-93806</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Gregerson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2801#comment-93806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dave, I would add that this approach works best when 1) the buyer has expertise in the acquisition&#039;s market and technology, 2) companies share similar cultures, 3) integration is a top level activity at buyer,  and 4) acquisition half the size of  buyer. Historically better than 70% of acquisitions fail to achieve an increase in valuation of the combined businesses. Those companies that regularly make acquisitions of smaller companies with similar cultures tend to get the most out of integration savings. The reason for making the acquisition is also a big factor. Buying complimentary technology (e.g. Google purchase of YouTube) is a better strategy than buying up market share (HP purchase of Compaq). While cost savings synergies can enhance an acquisition, the way they are implemented is critical. Forcing synergies between sister companies is usually a disaster. Even small changes can alienate management and erode value if acquired management feels they no longer are in control of their operations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I would add that this approach works best when 1) the buyer has expertise in the acquisition&#8217;s market and technology, 2) companies share similar cultures, 3) integration is a top level activity at buyer,  and 4) acquisition half the size of  buyer. Historically better than 70% of acquisitions fail to achieve an increase in valuation of the combined businesses. Those companies that regularly make acquisitions of smaller companies with similar cultures tend to get the most out of integration savings. The reason for making the acquisition is also a big factor. Buying complimentary technology (e.g. Google purchase of YouTube) is a better strategy than buying up market share (HP purchase of Compaq). While cost savings synergies can enhance an acquisition, the way they are implemented is critical. Forcing synergies between sister companies is usually a disaster. Even small changes can alienate management and erode value if acquired management feels they no longer are in control of their operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
