<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.lerougeliet.com/ns/rssFeedStyles#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: After 20 years: Updating the Berkus Method of valuation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://berkonomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=25-years-updating-the-berkus-valuation-method</link>
	<description>Dave Berkus&#039; business insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:42:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Berkus		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-174913</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Berkus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-174913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-174908&quot;&gt;Diana&lt;/a&gt;.

Diana,
Yes the $2.5M maximum is a suggestion as mentioned in the post. You can certainly inctrease or dcrease that number acdcording to factors sunch as international countries with lower maximum valuations.  And you can also add if you see something like &quot;AI&quot; driving prices higher.  Hope this helps.
Dave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-174908">Diana</a>.</p>
<p>Diana,<br />
Yes the $2.5M maximum is a suggestion as mentioned in the post. You can certainly inctrease or dcrease that number acdcording to factors sunch as international countries with lower maximum valuations.  And you can also add if you see something like &#8220;AI&#8221; driving prices higher.  Hope this helps.<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diana		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-174908</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 20:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-174908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you Mr. Berkus. I realize my question was ambiguous. 

I meant, would multiply the 2.5M maximum by a factor that takes into account if the company is doing cutting-edge AI? I see that preseed valuations of AI companies tend to be higher, in large part due to the promise and computational expense needed, so wanting your opinion on whether there should be a multiple applied to the maximum 2.5M?

Also, if a company is international and raising funds in different countries, where the average pre-seed valuation is vastly different (US is a factor of ~2.7 greater than in France, for example), how would you suggest rescaling the 2.5M maximum to cater to both investors in US and France?
Thank you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Mr. Berkus. I realize my question was ambiguous. </p>
<p>I meant, would multiply the 2.5M maximum by a factor that takes into account if the company is doing cutting-edge AI? I see that preseed valuations of AI companies tend to be higher, in large part due to the promise and computational expense needed, so wanting your opinion on whether there should be a multiple applied to the maximum 2.5M?</p>
<p>Also, if a company is international and raising funds in different countries, where the average pre-seed valuation is vastly different (US is a factor of ~2.7 greater than in France, for example), how would you suggest rescaling the 2.5M maximum to cater to both investors in US and France?<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Berkus		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-174854</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Berkus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 18:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-174854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-174852&quot;&gt;Diana Valencia&lt;/a&gt;.

Diana,  great question.  Each of the four principle areas of the Berkus Method are subjective, an area AI cannot help.  Of course, with more information, that opinion will change.  Since the information feeding the Method is only from the user, AI would only hlp if used before making the subjective score or valuation of that element.  Hope this helps.
-Dave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-174852">Diana Valencia</a>.</p>
<p>Diana,  great question.  Each of the four principle areas of the Berkus Method are subjective, an area AI cannot help.  Of course, with more information, that opinion will change.  Since the information feeding the Method is only from the user, AI would only hlp if used before making the subjective score or valuation of that element.  Hope this helps.<br />
-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diana Valencia		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-174852</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diana Valencia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-174852</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Berkus,
Thank you for providing this information. With the advent of ai, and especially agentic ai, would you revise the values?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Berkus,<br />
Thank you for providing this information. With the advent of ai, and especially agentic ai, would you revise the values?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Berkus		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-158545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Berkus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-158545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-158533&quot;&gt;Tamara&lt;/a&gt;.

Tamara, good point.  For years, I&#039;ve been adding a comment in my keynotes adjusting original and current liquidity event values for inflation as you did above. But the valuation of startups at or near ignition is much more difficult. For example, valuations offered by investors to entrepreneurs have declined since the stock market hits and probably will decline further if we continue toward recession. There are also far more deals competing for investor funds now than years ago.  And the valuations have differed so much in geographical areas that one number is impossible.  So to answer your question: This is an art not a science, driven by so many factors that a single number like $500,000 is only a guide not a rule.  Is a $500,000 value worth over $900,000 today?  Not at all.  Too many factors listed above have depressed startup values recently. A tool such as the Method must allow for all these changes and more to remain viable over time.  Thanks for bringing up this issue! - Dave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-158533">Tamara</a>.</p>
<p>Tamara, good point.  For years, I&#8217;ve been adding a comment in my keynotes adjusting original and current liquidity event values for inflation as you did above. But the valuation of startups at or near ignition is much more difficult. For example, valuations offered by investors to entrepreneurs have declined since the stock market hits and probably will decline further if we continue toward recession. There are also far more deals competing for investor funds now than years ago.  And the valuations have differed so much in geographical areas that one number is impossible.  So to answer your question: This is an art not a science, driven by so many factors that a single number like $500,000 is only a guide not a rule.  Is a $500,000 value worth over $900,000 today?  Not at all.  Too many factors listed above have depressed startup values recently. A tool such as the Method must allow for all these changes and more to remain viable over time.  Thanks for bringing up this issue! &#8211; Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tamara		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-158533</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-158533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the update. I have a question around inflation - given that 500k USD back in 1999 now has a purchasing power of around 900k USD (average 2.56%pa, based on nationalised USA Bureau of Labour Statistics), would it make sense in your view to increase the allocated ballpark valuation per category in alignment with this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the update. I have a question around inflation &#8211; given that 500k USD back in 1999 now has a purchasing power of around 900k USD (average 2.56%pa, based on nationalised USA Bureau of Labour Statistics), would it make sense in your view to increase the allocated ballpark valuation per category in alignment with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Berkus		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-151677</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Berkus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-151677</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-151669&quot;&gt;Harsha M L&lt;/a&gt;.

Responses to your questions:
1. Patents do help, but defense and prosecution costs are very high and offset much of the advantage. I count patents into the market validation section by increasing that value.
Yes, add the scores to obtain the valuation.
-Dave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-151669">Harsha M L</a>.</p>
<p>Responses to your questions:<br />
1. Patents do help, but defense and prosecution costs are very high and offset much of the advantage. I count patents into the market validation section by increasing that value.<br />
Yes, add the scores to obtain the valuation.<br />
-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Harsha M L		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-151669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harsha M L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-151669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sir,
I have 2 questions,
1. Idea patented, does it carry extra weightage
2. Do we have to add up all the scores in 5 sectors.
I am a founder of Solar Startup from India, arriving at average startup valuation is very fluid, how do we solve this?
Looking forward for your valuable response,
Regards,
Harsha M  L
India]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,<br />
I have 2 questions,<br />
1. Idea patented, does it carry extra weightage<br />
2. Do we have to add up all the scores in 5 sectors.<br />
I am a founder of Solar Startup from India, arriving at average startup valuation is very fluid, how do we solve this?<br />
Looking forward for your valuable response,<br />
Regards,<br />
Harsha M  L<br />
India</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SUNIL KAPOOR		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-146921</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SUNIL KAPOOR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2021 09:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-146921</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you Sir.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Berkus		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-146875</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Berkus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 15:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752#comment-146875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-146872&quot;&gt;SUNIL KAPOOR&lt;/a&gt;.

To convert to another currency or location, first determine the average valuation of pre-revenue startups in your area.  Divide by five and that should be the maximum you would pay for each of the items in the matrix.  Thanks for asking.
-Dave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://berkonomics.com/?p=2752&#038;cpage=1#comment-146872">SUNIL KAPOOR</a>.</p>
<p>To convert to another currency or location, first determine the average valuation of pre-revenue startups in your area.  Divide by five and that should be the maximum you would pay for each of the items in the matrix.  Thanks for asking.<br />
-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
