<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.lerougeliet.com/ns/rssFeedStyles#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Quality, Quantity, and Values – Rating Your Associates.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://berkonomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=1528&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quality-quantity-and-values-rating-your-associates</link>
	<description>Dave Berkus&#039; business insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:05:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Berni		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=1528&#038;cpage=1#comment-6594</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=1528#comment-6594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A counterpoint to Dan . . . I use it to this day, not so much to manage the individual but to teach the manager some lessons in objectivity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A counterpoint to Dan . . . I use it to this day, not so much to manage the individual but to teach the manager some lessons in objectivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Hoefflin		</title>
		<link>https://berkonomics.com/?p=1528&#038;cpage=1#comment-6593</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Hoefflin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://berkonomics.com/?p=1528#comment-6593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This may sound like heresy, but after seriously and meticulously conducting performance reviews for 30 years, I can&#039;t say they ever made much of a difference.  The outstanding employees always excelled, and the weak/lazy ones rarely got a whole lot better from the review process.

If employees are regularly and properly managed with an open/participatory management style and there&#039;s a positive environment that encourages good interaction with fellow workers and managers, then people quickly figure out where they stand among their peers -- and management can assess their progress (or lack thereof).

It&#039;s always a mistake to &quot;wait for the review&quot; to coach/praise/admonish a worker, and the inherent tension in a formal review often complicates a relaxed discussion of goals and objectives.  I&#039;ve often wondered if the employee simply isn&#039;t primarily focused on whether or not he/she will get the raise or promotion they desire.

While I&#039;m not advocating dropping the review process (for legal and administrative reasons), and while I do believe there is some benefit, I do question the real value for either the manager or the subordinate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may sound like heresy, but after seriously and meticulously conducting performance reviews for 30 years, I can&#8217;t say they ever made much of a difference.  The outstanding employees always excelled, and the weak/lazy ones rarely got a whole lot better from the review process.</p>
<p>If employees are regularly and properly managed with an open/participatory management style and there&#8217;s a positive environment that encourages good interaction with fellow workers and managers, then people quickly figure out where they stand among their peers &#8212; and management can assess their progress (or lack thereof).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always a mistake to &#8220;wait for the review&#8221; to coach/praise/admonish a worker, and the inherent tension in a formal review often complicates a relaxed discussion of goals and objectives.  I&#8217;ve often wondered if the employee simply isn&#8217;t primarily focused on whether or not he/she will get the raise or promotion they desire.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m not advocating dropping the review process (for legal and administrative reasons), and while I do believe there is some benefit, I do question the real value for either the manager or the subordinate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
